BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//PEASEC - Science and Technology for Peace and Security | Technical University of Darmstadt - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:PEASEC - Science and Technology for Peace and Security | Technical University of Darmstadt
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://peasec.de
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for PEASEC - Science and Technology for Peace and Security | Technical University of Darmstadt
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20231206T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20231206T164500
DTSTAMP:20260411T135136
CREATED:20230626T151119Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230919T091316Z
UID:15548-1701871200-1701881100@peasec.de
SUMMARY:Disputation Franz Kuntke: "Resilient Smart Farming: Crisis-Capable Information and Communication Technologies for Agriculture"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract:\nAs in many sectors\, agriculture is experiencing a continuous digitalization\, i.e. an increase in data-driven technologies used. In contrast to companies of other critical infrastructures – e.g. energy or telecommunication – a typical farm is comparatively small and often run as a family business. Accordingly\, the demands on farming technology\, its implementation\, and regulations are different in many terms. Also\, the circumstances that influence crisis risks and crisis management are different in agriculture – and as digitalization introduces new potential risks\, this process should be critically reviewed. But research in the area of farming equipment mostly concentrates on positive aspects of modern technologies. The current state-of-the-art approaches for agriculture are often referred under terms smart farming and agriculture 4.0\, that incorporates more precise cultivation with less (manual) effort. But such new agriculture technology developments usually lack an assessment about its impact on the sector’s resilience and dependencies on other infrastructures. The research domain of disaster and risk sciences mostly concentrates on other topics\, apart from agriculture\, and the resilience research in agriculture itself is currently intensifying\, but focusing more on problems resulting from climate and social change. For this reasons it remains unclear\, how digitalization impacts resilience of the food production and food safety. Therefore\, it is not well researched which technological developments may lead to undesired effects in the future. And how modern systems should be designed to allow for both\, positive impacts on efficiency\, and prevention of negative effects in terms of reduced resilience capacities\, is also not answered by literature yet. Aim of the present work is to close this research gap in the interplay between agriculture\, digitalization and resilience.\nTo answer the question to what extent current technologies used by farmers are at risk of failure\, the dissertation first presents a snapshot of the resilience state of agricultural companies and their used technologies. This involves interviews with stakeholders\, mainly farmers\, as well as surveying security issues of the LoRaWAN protocol\, a transmission technology especially useful for agricultural Internet of Things. Which desires of farmers regarding software focusing on aspects of business continuity and secured operations exist\, is another open question\, that is also answered with empirical methods\, mainly focus groups and usability tests. Then the rise of Internet of Things in agriculture raises another question\, whether such technologies acquired for smart farming could also have benefits for resilience against internet-connection-lost situations. This question is answered by empirical evaluation of LoRaWAN range characteristics in agricultural landscapes\, as well as artifact generation for resilient communication channels on top of LoRaWAN transmission devices.\nSeveral findings are derived from the conducted research: There is a lack in understanding how strong the used tools in agriculture are dependent on Information and Communications Technology\, and many tools does require a working internet connection. Additionally\, information technology used by agricultural companies has security issues\, as in other domains\, which must be considered at best in the design phase of technology by system engineers\, but should be at the latest a decision criteria when users choose a new technology. Based on these findings\, developments and evaluations of new software approaches are presented: Derived design criteria and own system designs\, that allow for modern data-driven business operations\, including Internet of Things integration based on LoRaWAN. The developed solutions show an increase of resilience capacities by enhancing the communication possibilities in crisis situations. The thesis points out\, how the state of resilience in agriculture of developed countries is today\, and what to expect from current generation technology. Additionally\, it builds new concepts and software artifacts as an example\, how disaster-capable features can be integrated into information management systems for a more crisis-proof future of farm operations. \nMi. 6. Dezember 2023\, 14:00-15:45 Uhr im CYSEC-Gebäude\n(Gebäudenummer: S2/20; Anschrift: Pankratiusstr. 2\, Darmstadt\, Raum: 9). \n\n14:00h: öffentlicher Vortrag von 30min\n14:30h: Wissenschaftliches Gespräch von 60min\n15:30h: Interne Kommissionssitzung und Ergebnisverkündung\nab 15:45h: Empfang
URL:https://peasec.de/event/disputation-franz-kuntke-resilient-smart-farming-crisis-capable-information-and-communication-technologies-for-agriculture/
CATEGORIES:Disputation
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20231206T161500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20231206T175500
DTSTAMP:20260411T135136
CREATED:20230925T055916Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231128T114350Z
UID:16091-1701879300-1701885300@peasec.de
SUMMARY:Sichere Kritische Infrastruktur: Resilienz – eine in Deutschland unbekannte Erscheinung? (Albrecht Broemme\, Präsident THW 2006-2009) – NUR IN ZOOM!
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://peasec.de/event/sichere-kritische-infrastruktur-resilienz-eine-in-deutschland-unbekannte-erscheinung-albrecht-broemme-praesident-thw-2006-2009/
LOCATION:Raum S103/123 (Altes Hauptgebäude\, Hochschulstraße 1\, 64289 Darmstadt) und in ZOOM
CATEGORIES:Ringvorlesung Sichere Kritische Infrastrukturen
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20231211T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20231211T092500
DTSTAMP:20260411T135136
CREATED:20231205T114705Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231205T114705Z
UID:16696-1702285200-1702286700@peasec.de
SUMMARY:Bachelorarbeit Informatik von Hiba Al-Najmi: The Impact Of Automation Levels On Trust And Acceptance Of Smart Home Warning Systems
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: In this study\, we address the under-explored dimension of human interaction with smart home warning systems during crisis scenarios\, with focus on the identification of the optimal automation level. An experimental study was conducted with a sample of 51 participants in a controlled laboratory environment\, which emulated smart home warning systems. Each participant engaged with one of three distinct levels of automation and encountered four distinct warnings with varying levels of danger. Subsequently\, participants made decisions and potentially took actions in response to the warnings displayed by the system and the suggested protocols proposed by the system. These decisions encompassed choices to permit the system to proceed with execution\, to halt or even revert the process\, or to manually execute or refrain from executing the suggested actions. For instance\, this could involve actions such as closing doors and windows in response to a gas leak incident originating from a nearby factory. Data were gathered via surveys and subsequently analyzed using ANOVA to discern significant differences in responses across the automation levels. The study revealed that the System Usability Scale (SUS) scores were consistently high across different levels of automation\, indicating a uniformly high ease of use regardless of automation degree. Additionally\, it was found that users responded significantly differently to critical versus non-critical smart home warnings\, demonstrating the system’s effectiveness in appropriately categorizing and conveying the urgency of notifications. \n  \nBetreuer*in: Steffen Haesler\, M.Sc. \nPrüfer: Prof. Dr. Dr. Christian Reuter
URL:https://peasec.de/event/bachelorarbeit-najmi/
LOCATION:Zoom
CATEGORIES:Kolloquium
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20231213T161500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20231213T175500
DTSTAMP:20260411T135136
CREATED:20230925T060226Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231206T161140Z
UID:16093-1702484100-1702490100@peasec.de
SUMMARY:Sichere Kritische Infrastruktur: Methoden für ein Risikomanagement physischer Infrastrukturen (Sascha Düerkop\, Fraunhofer-Institut für Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Trendanalysen)
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://peasec.de/event/kritis-duerkop/
LOCATION:Raum S103/123 (Altes Hauptgebäude\, Hochschulstraße 1\, 64289 Darmstadt) und in ZOOM
CATEGORIES:Ringvorlesung Sichere Kritische Infrastrukturen
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR